Runs specified stan model for the force-of-infection
fit_seromodel.Rd
Runs specified stan model for the force-of-infection
Arguments
- serosurvey
survey_year
Year in which the survey took place (only needed to plot time models)
age_min
Floor value of the average between age_min and age_max
age_max
The size of the sample
n_sample
Number of samples for each age group
n_seropositive
Number of positive samples for each age group
- model_type
Type of the model. Either "constant", "age" or "time"
- is_log_foi
Boolean to set logarithmic scale in the FOI
- foi_prior
Force-of-infection distribution specified by means of the helper functions. Currently available options are:
- sf_normal
Function to set normal distribution priors
- sf_uniform
Function to set uniform distribution priors
- foi_sigma_rw
Prior distribution for the standard deviation of the force-of-infection. Currently available options are:
- foi_index
Integer vector specifying the age-groups for which force-of-infection values will be estimated. It can be specified by means of get_foi_index
- is_seroreversion
Boolean specifying whether to include seroreversion rate estimation in the model
- seroreversion_prior
seroreversion distribution specified by means of the helper functions. Currently available options are:
- sf_normal
Function to set normal distribution priors
- sf_uniform
Function to set uniform distribution priors
- sf_none
Function to set no prior distribution
- ...
Additional parameters for rstan
Examples
data(veev2012)
seromodel <- fit_seromodel(
serosurvey = veev2012,
model_type = "time",
foi_index = get_foi_index(veev2012, group_size = 30, model_type = "time")
)
#>
#> SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'time_no_seroreversion' NOW (CHAIN 1).
#> Chain 1:
#> Chain 1: Gradient evaluation took 7.9e-05 seconds
#> Chain 1: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.79 seconds.
#> Chain 1: Adjust your expectations accordingly!
#> Chain 1:
#> Chain 1:
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 1 / 2000 [ 0%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 200 / 2000 [ 10%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 400 / 2000 [ 20%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 600 / 2000 [ 30%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 800 / 2000 [ 40%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 1:
#> Chain 1: Elapsed Time: 0.372 seconds (Warm-up)
#> Chain 1: 0.291 seconds (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: 0.663 seconds (Total)
#> Chain 1:
#>
#> SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'time_no_seroreversion' NOW (CHAIN 2).
#> Chain 2:
#> Chain 2: Gradient evaluation took 4.5e-05 seconds
#> Chain 2: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.45 seconds.
#> Chain 2: Adjust your expectations accordingly!
#> Chain 2:
#> Chain 2:
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 1 / 2000 [ 0%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 200 / 2000 [ 10%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 400 / 2000 [ 20%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 600 / 2000 [ 30%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 800 / 2000 [ 40%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 2:
#> Chain 2: Elapsed Time: 0.365 seconds (Warm-up)
#> Chain 2: 0.286 seconds (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: 0.651 seconds (Total)
#> Chain 2:
#>
#> SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'time_no_seroreversion' NOW (CHAIN 3).
#> Chain 3:
#> Chain 3: Gradient evaluation took 4.4e-05 seconds
#> Chain 3: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.44 seconds.
#> Chain 3: Adjust your expectations accordingly!
#> Chain 3:
#> Chain 3:
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 1 / 2000 [ 0%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 200 / 2000 [ 10%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 400 / 2000 [ 20%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 600 / 2000 [ 30%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 800 / 2000 [ 40%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 3:
#> Chain 3: Elapsed Time: 0.355 seconds (Warm-up)
#> Chain 3: 0.297 seconds (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: 0.652 seconds (Total)
#> Chain 3:
#>
#> SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'time_no_seroreversion' NOW (CHAIN 4).
#> Chain 4:
#> Chain 4: Gradient evaluation took 4.5e-05 seconds
#> Chain 4: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.45 seconds.
#> Chain 4: Adjust your expectations accordingly!
#> Chain 4:
#> Chain 4:
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 1 / 2000 [ 0%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 200 / 2000 [ 10%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 400 / 2000 [ 20%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 600 / 2000 [ 30%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 800 / 2000 [ 40%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 4:
#> Chain 4: Elapsed Time: 0.374 seconds (Warm-up)
#> Chain 4: 0.278 seconds (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: 0.652 seconds (Total)
#> Chain 4:
#> Warning: There were 28 divergent transitions after warmup. See
#> https://mc-stan.org/misc/warnings.html#divergent-transitions-after-warmup
#> to find out why this is a problem and how to eliminate them.
#> Warning: Examine the pairs() plot to diagnose sampling problems